Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.61 out of 10) and total score (7.58 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- 6.29 out of 10 (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X
