Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) and durability (8.61 out of 10). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- With a score like 8.43 out of 10 (235g / 8,29oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Penn Battle III 6000X
