Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (4) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 235g / 8,29oz and a gear ratio of 6.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD?
Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X
- With a score like 8.43 out of 10 (235g / 8,29oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
