Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II , 2000, left and right hand, Saltwater Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 1522156
Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings9

Technical Specifications

  • BrandPENN
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €185.20
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD, 3010, left and right hand, Match & Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10406-305
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €292.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3010
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and the total score (9.04 out of 10). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a ergonomics of 6.22 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?

There are not much differences between the two comparables