Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
Feeder And Match
90.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.51 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight455g / 16.05oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €312.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (7) and the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 235g / 8,29oz and a gear ratio of 6.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD?
Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X
- With a score like 8.43 out of 10 (235g / 8,29oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
- With a ball bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (7), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Delphin REDIX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX
