Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT
Spinning
56.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D(U)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X edges out Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.61 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). Still, Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 5 and a weight of 175g / 6,17oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X
- 6.29 out of 10 (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX
