Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
50.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €39.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X clearly outshines Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) and durability (8.61 out of 10). While Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- 6.29 out of 10 (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX
