Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.61 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4.5kg / 9,92lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220

Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Spinning
36.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.94 out of 10
Ergonomics4.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight255g / 9.00oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €46.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 1000 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.61 out of 10) and total score (7.58 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 1000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Sahara 1000 R?
Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X
- A drag rating of 6.38 out of 10 (4,5kg / 9,92lbs) gives you steady control and it's perfect for most freshwater fish and light saltwater action
- 6.29 out of 10 (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 1000 R
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX
