Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Abu GARCIA Revo MGX
Spinning
20 Sp/lx
63.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight170g / 6.38oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €255.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 SP/L
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/220
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 84 centimeter / 33.07 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Abu GARCIA Revo MGX?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6,38oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX
