Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (6,8kg / 14,99lbs). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.37 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX
