Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €23.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/200
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (6,8kg / 14,99lbs). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX
