Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a maximum drag of 6,8kg / 14,99lbs, while Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 95 centimeter / 37.4 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.6 out of 10 (5.5:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95 centimeter / 37.4 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X
