Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 6,8kg / 14,99lbs and a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.3 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X
