Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
78.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.3 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €196.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 6,8kg / 14,99lbs and a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.3 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX
