Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT
Spinning
71.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €68.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the line retrieve per crank (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X
