Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.04 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €187.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and gear ratio (4.8:1). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.49 out of 10 (265g / 9,35oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- With a line retrieve of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch (5.29 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX
