Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and gear ratio (4.7:1). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.26 out of 10 (305g / 10,76oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Delphin YUPIE vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX
