Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight395g / 13.93oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €199.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and line retrieve per crank (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33.86 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX
