Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT
Spinning
91.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €234.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 8000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 8000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX
