Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
68.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €79.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 20 Fuego LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
