Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT
Feeder And Match
64.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.61 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €72.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX stands out for a ball bearings of 4. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.34 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X
Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R
Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X
Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX
Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX
Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX