Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.30 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (4.7:1) and line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.29 out of 10 (300g / 10,58oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
