Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (4.7:1) and line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.34 out of 10 (290g / 10,23oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
