Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
84.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight405g / 14.29oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €299.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch) and gear ratio (4.9:1). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33.86 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
Similar comparisons

Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX
