Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €204.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and gear ratio (6.2:1). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX
