Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €204.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and gear ratio (6.2:1). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX
