Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €204.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Delphin IXTREK 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX
