Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX
