Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X
