Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €218.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Delphin HORNET 50X
