Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity
Spinning
84.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.63 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €484.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/200
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.2:1) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X
