Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
90.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and ball bearings (6). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX
