Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
90.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.62 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €185.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and ball bearings (6). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX
