Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €195.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX
