Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero 4000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
