Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX
