Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX
