Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT
Spinning
72.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.73 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €96.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.3:1). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX
