Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
80.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000 S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.8:1) and ball bearings (6). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX
