Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €199.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 S-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and ball bearings (6). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X
