Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.3:1). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 S HGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX
