Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
85.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Delphin IXTREK 5000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X
