Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €99.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Delphin FRIZ vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
