Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT
Spinning
64.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €70.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-XH(U)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.57 out of 10 (81 centimeter / 31.89 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
