Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL
Multireels
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.9 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight540g / 19.05oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €699.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/400
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and ball bearings (8). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL?
Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL
- Higher gear ratio of 5.1:1 (scoring 9.2 out of 10), provides more speed meaning a better solution when quick retrieves really count
- Scoring 8.2 out of 10 (540g / 19,05oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a retrieve score of 5.71 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
- With a high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (8), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX
