Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN
Spinning
54.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.02 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight295g / 10.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €45.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/200
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.3:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.03 out of 10 (295g / 10,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
