Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
64.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €51.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeLT3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.7:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX
