Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
55.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight365g / 12.88oz
Line retireve per crank92 centimeter / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €59.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeLT6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 92 centimeter / 36.22 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- 8.7 out of 10 (92 centimeter / 36.22 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa BG 1500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa BG 1500X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX
