Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
55.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 23 Revros LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Catana 4000 RC vs Delphin INKS 2000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX
