Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT
Spinning
65.30 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32283 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €70.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 5. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32283 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X
