Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT
Spinning
65.30 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32283 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €70.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 5. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32283 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X
