Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT
Spinning
65.30 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32283 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €70.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 5. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32283 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX
Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX
Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag
Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX
Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag
Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX
Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X
Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX
Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX
Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX
Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
