Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
83.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €230.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2508QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (4.8:1) and weight (250g / 8,82oz). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- With a line retrieve of 72 centimeter / 28.35 inch (5.29 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500-HX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX
