Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (4.8:1) and line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.29 out of 10 (300g / 10,58oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
