Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa 24 TDR QD
Feeder And Match
84.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.94 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €229.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012QD-DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (4.8:1) and line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 24 TDR QD?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated 8.29 out of 10 (300g / 10,58oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
