Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa BG MQ
Seafishing
59.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability4 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €159.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 99 centimeter / 38.98 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa BG MQ?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX
- With a weight score of 9.19 out of 10 (285g / 10,05oz), this reel is impressively light for saltwater and provides great comfort
- With a fast retrieve 99 centimeter / 38.98 inch, the reel helps you stay on top of fast runs and cover water efficiently
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (6), the reel runs smooth under pressure
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX


Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX


Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Spheros SW SP3000XGSWX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 PGX


Daiwa BG MQ 10000-HX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 8000 HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX
