Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa BG 4000X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa BG
Spinning
69.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.79 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight405g / 14.29oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €108.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Daiwa BG 4000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a maximum drag of 6,8kg / 14,99lbs, while Daiwa BG 4000X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 101 centimeter / 39.76 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa BG?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
Daiwa BG 4000X
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- A high retrieve rate of 9.6 out of 10 (101 centimeter / 39.76 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X
