Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa Crossfire LT
Spinning
49.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.50
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX clearly outshines Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa Crossfire LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.27 out of 10 (260g / 9,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 5000DX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX
