Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280

Daiwa Freams LT
Spinning
65.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.8 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €110.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX and Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX offers a maximum drag of 6,8kg / 14,99lbs, while Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.3:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa Freams LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- For 8.8 out of 10 (6,8kg / 14,99lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.63 out of 10 (205g / 7,23oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX
